Each one of us is affected by the decisions of other people, too numerous and far-reaching to comprehend. If we were raised in a country where the preaching of the gospel is prevalent, we have a myriad of people in the past to thank for that. Conversely, those who are born in countries without the gospel are there as a result of just as many people in the past. And that’s just the bigger picture. In my own family, the faith of one man, my mother’s grandfather, quickly resulted in the conversion of his son-in-law and daughter (my grandparents), with at least seven of their thirteen children to follow in the faith. This included my mother, in whose footsteps of faith I followed as well. So I thank God for that great-grandfather whom I cannot remember meeting.
Much is made of free will in the salvation decision; but rarely does anyone do the hard task of grappling with the difficult ramifications of such an easily made claim. One of the most difficult of those ramifications is the fact that human beings cannot help but affect one another with their decisions. We do not decide anything in a vacuum (or as an “island”). And whether we like it or not, we are often “hemmed in” by the choices of others, for better or for worse. Often, we are in control of very little.
So then, who is really in control? If we deny that God is in control of events, then that puts the control of events into the combined but independent wills of innumerable mankind — billions of independent wills bearing on the events of every individual (not to mention the practical randomness of natural factors, such as weather, earthquakes, etc.). With such a myriad of uncontrolled factors, random chance is the virtual result, and we are chained by each other’s freedom. If all men are “free” to determine their own destiny, then no man is really free. When the free wills of billions of people interact and collide, chance circumstance will decide what opportunities and influences come your way, as it all depends upon the myriad of decisions of others, both present and past. Men may appear to be masters of their own destinies, but they are no more free in the decision than they would be under Calvinism. Disparities of influence and opportunity are rampant; and such disparities are selective by nature, having a direct bearing on the salvation decision of men. Either these disparities are purposely controlled by God or random chance is the result.
Falling back to the claim of a minimally adequate revelation (Rom. 1:18-20), such that all men are left without excuse, would simply show an unwillingness to squarely face the difficult question. If greater influences and opportunities (such as those that would come to a land if the gospel was introduced) empirically result in conversions that would not otherwise result, then who is in control of these selective factors? And on a smaller scale, who was in control of whether or not my great-grandfather would believe and bring many family members to faith? If he had decided against Christ, the family would not have benefited from his influence toward God. Was this just our good fortune? Is it also our good fortune to be raised in America instead of some place devoid of the gospel?
Are you prepared to acknowledge that God has left the destinies of men to mere chance? If so, then you might just as well bid people good luck as to pray for them to be blessed. Those who are now in hell and never heard of Christ are there due to having the worst of luck. Or… Are you able to recognize that God is ultimately in control of the destinies of men, and nothing is left to chance — not even the virtual chance that results from how the decisions of others bear upon your life?