Does Your Anchor Hold Within the Veil?

by Ken Hamrick

Heb. 6:19, “This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and steadfast, and which enters the Presence behind the veil…” (NKJV)
Col. 1:27, “To them God willed to make known what are the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles: which is Christ in you, the hope of glory.” (NKJV)
1 Cor. 6:19, “Or do you not know that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and you are not your own?” (NKJV)

To hear that someone we thought of as a brother in the Lord—a pastor, a teacher of sound doctrine and a contender for the faith—has now renounced his faith… well, it weighs on my soul, as I’m sure it does with many of you. So we bring this burden before the Lord, praying for this man’s salvation. But we can’t help asking with exasperation, how could this happen?! After all, we try to spoon-feed sinners as much truth about God as we can get into them, in hope that some of it will take root on good ground. But here’s a man who knew much about God (or so it would seem); so where’s the fruit now? When someone of such stature falls away, it gives pause to all of us to examine ourselves. What anchors my soul?—and will it hold “‘in every high and stormy gale,’ ‘when all around my soul gives way?‘”[1] The time for such tough questions is while the sea is still calm. What anchors your soul?

It will not do to simply answer, “Christ is my Anchor.” Our fallen friend would have answered the same not long ago. Indeed, Christ is the only possible anchor for anyone. But how is He anchoring you? If your anchor is but Christ written on a page, then it will anchor you no more than a book about anchors, tied to a chain, would anchor a real ship. Please don’t misunderstand me. Our faith does stand on the written word of God; but only because that written word is true—and it is that truth and not the written words that anchors our soul—and not a mere set of propositions, but the truth of Christ in us. When we embrace the truth as revealed in the Bible and confirmed by the conviction of the Holy Spirit, God then indwells us and Christ becomes the Presence in the temple of our soul. Without true faith, He will not come; and without Him in us, we have no anchor and no hope. It should now be painfully evident that it is possible to embrace the written word of God without fully embracing the God of that word. God will not embrace a double-minded man, nor indwell half a heart.

Have you considered the depth of your own faith? The Bible tells us, in 2 Peter 1:10, to “be even more diligent to make your call and election sure…” and in 2 Corinthians 13:5, “Examine yourselves, to see whether you are in the faith. Test yourselves. Or do you not realize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you?—unless indeed you fail to meet the test!” So the question is, are you in the faith? Don’t be content to rest in the fact that you went to the altar or made a decision for Christ. It is possible to make a decision that does not come from the depths of your heart, and does not include the kind of genuine faith that saves through Christ. Examine yourselves… Faith is more than believing that Christ is the Son of God, and that He died for the sin of the world, and rose on the third day, and that all who believe in Him will be saved. Believing these things about Him is not the same as believing in Him. “You believe that God is one; you do well. Even the demons believe–and shudder!” (James 2:19). Even the demons believe these things about Him and know that they are true. Belief must be more than informational—belief must be submissional.

In other words, we must embrace Him with our whole heart, desiring to forsake self, sin, and the world. We must want with our whole heart to live in Him and die to our old self. “Then Jesus told his disciples, ‘If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.‘” Anyone who prays the “sinner’s prayer,” while saving his life for himself rather than surrendering his life to Christ, is only fooling himself. When a sinner surrenders to Christ, his “old man,” his self-life, is “crucified in Christ” and put to death. In this way, the believer forsakes and leaves behind all that he used to be, and “rises again” to new life in Christ. This is what it means for the sinner to deny himself and take up his cross and follow Christ.

A. W. Tozer said, in The Pursuit of God:

[…] For it is not mere words that nourish the soul, but God Himself, and unless and until the hearers find God in personal experience they are not the better for having heard the truth. The Bible is not an end in itself, but a means to bring men to an intimate and satisfying knowledge of God, that they may enter into Him, that they may delight in His Presence, may taste and know the inner sweetness of the very God Himself in the core and center of their hearts.[2]

Tozer explained, in The Pursuit of Man, the vital importance of a real encounter with a present and personal God; and how the sense of the Presence of God empowers believers, and protects their faith from the attacks of the enemy (bold mine):

Wherever faith has been original, wherever it has proved itself to be real, it has invariably had upon it a sense of the present God. The holy Scriptures possess in marked degree this feeling of actual encounter with a real Person.[…] It was this that filled with abiding wonder the first members of the Church of Christ.[…] They were in the very Presence of God. And the power of that conviction to arrest attention and hold it for a lifetime, to elevate, to transform, to fill with uncontrollable moral happiness, to send men singing to prison and to death, has been one of the wonders of history and a marvel of the world. Our fathers have told us and our own hearts confirm how wonderful is this sense of Someone there. It makes religion invulnerable to critical attack. It secures the mind against collapse under the battering of the enemy. They who worship the God who is present may ignore the objections of unbelieving men. Their experience is self-verifying and needs neither defense nor proof. What they see and hear overwhelms their doubts and confirms their assurance beyond the power of argument to destroy.[3]

Tozer goes on to contrast real experience with “reason upon texts” and “the conclusions of logic” (bold mine):

Nothing can take the place of the touch of God in the soul and the sense of Someone there. Real faith, indeed, brings such realization, for real faith is never the operation of reason upon texts. Where true faith is, the knowledge of God will be given as a fact of consciousness altogether apart from the conclusions of logic. Were a man to awaken in the pitch dark at midnight and hear someone moving about in his room and know that the unseen presence was a loved member of his family who had every right to be there, his heart might be filled with a sense of quiet pleasure; but should he have reason to believe that an intruder had entered, perhaps to rob or to kill, he would lie in terror and stare at the darkness not knowing from which direction the expected blow might come. But the difference between experience and no experience would be that acute sense of someone there. Is it not true that for most of us who call ourselves Christians there is no real experience? We have substituted theological ideas for an arresting encounter; we are full of religious notions, but our great weakness is that for our hearts there is no one there. Whatever else it embraces, true Christian experience must always include a genuine encounter with God. Without this, religion is but a shadow, a reflection of reality, a cheap copy of an original once enjoyed by someone else of whom we have heard.[…][4]

For too long, we have dismissed experience and “feeling” as irrelevant and unnecessary to faith. With good intentions of stressing that faith does not depend on emotion or experience, we have filled the congregations with people who have no encounter with God. We have taught people to trust the promises of God and to not worry about experience. But we have taught it in such a way as to bar many of them from a true faith that would naturally result in knowing the presence of God. It is true that we are saved by faith and not by good works or by experiencing God’s presence; however, a faith that does not result in both of these is missing something vital, and ought to drive us back to the cross to make our calling and election sure.

The problem is not in the dependability of God’s promises, as if one might believe in Christ and still not be indwelt by His Spirit; but rather, the problem is in assuming the trustworthiness of our own heart in coming to Christ. The absence of a real encounter with God should give us a godly distrust of our faith, and should not be dismissed as unimportant. But instead of being driven back to that place of decision to make their salvation sure, converts are taught to give no weight to “feeling” or experience. To be saved and believe in Christ only requires a decision… but it requires an honest decision from the depths of one’s heart. And the God who looks on the heart is not swayed by mere words. A man can be saved without saying a thing; and a man may remain lost though he say all the right things. Jesus told us, in Matt. 7:21-23 NKJV, that there will be many who call Him “Lord, Lord,” but will be told by Him, “I never knew you. Depart from Me…” That verse should be sobering to everyone who calls Him, “Lord.”

God desires truth from us—“truth in the inward parts” (Psalm 51:6 NKJV). Human beings are sinful by nature, and we easily deceive ourselves rather than face difficult truths. Jeremiah 17:9-10 NKJV tells us, “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked; Who can know it? I, the Lord, search the heart, I test the mind, Even to give every man according to his ways, According to the fruit of his doings.” Let us all search our own heart, and face the truth of who we are in our inward being. This is the most important matter in life, for “how shall we escape if we neglect so great a salvation… ?” (Hebrews 2:3 NKJV). This is why we are told, in Philippians 2:12, “…work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

By teaching that God works merely in the manner of an accountant, taking His divine pen and record book, and moving the sinner from one column to the other—as if the saving transaction occurs only in some far-removed court in heaven, we have lost the link between God and the reality of the here and the present. By teaching that God simply imputes to us the righteousness of Christ without regard to our reality, we have propagated a faith that is just as putative and nominal. As such, if we take the pen and record of our mind, and move Christ into the category of Son of God, perfectly righteous man, Savior who died for the sin of the world, One who rose from the dead on the third day, etc., then God, in turn, will move us in His record book from the sinners’ column to the saints’ column. Slam! goes the gavel, and it’s a done deal.

But the God of the Bible is more than a God who imputes—He is a God who consummates. His method is not that of an accountant who cannot see past his books. Rather, His method is that of a Holy Spirit who fills our hearts and lives, becoming one with us in spirit and identity. He meets all the demands of justice within reality by joining to Himself not only our penalty but our person—so that I can say in truth with Paul, (Gal. 2:20 NKJV) “I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me...” The imputation in the court of heaven is not putative and nominal, but is firmly grounded on the reality of Christ indwelling the sinner so that the two become one new man in Him. Therefore, it misses the mark to tell new converts to trust that they are saved based only on the promise of God to make such an imputation. “God cannot lie, so it doesn’t matter whether or not you feel any different—just trust Him to keep His promise to save those who believe,” is the common exhortation. But any sinner who trusts in heaven’s imputation without experiencing God’s consummation has put his trust in the wrong place: his own faith.

It is true that God will save any who believe in Christ. However, it is also true that God resists the proud (Ja. 4:6), and “If I regard sin in my heart, the Lord will not hear” me (Ps. 66:18 NKJV). Just as He is more than a God who imputes, He requires us to have more than a putative faith. Just as He embraces the believer with the whole of His Spirit, He requires us to fully embrace Him with ours. He will not accept half-hearted measures or a faith that holds back. We should warn sinners of this instead of reassuring them. It is possible to have a disingenuous faith, and to show outward signs that are seemingly commensurate with conversion. Do not trust in imputation alone—no imputation is possible unless Christ is in you. Is He in you? Have you met Him in this way? Do you know His presence? If He is in you, then you can no more deny His existence than you can deny your own. But if you do not know a God who is present—a Christ who is in you—then you had better examine yourself before God to see if you are really saved or not. Either Christ is in you or you are lost. 

Ken Hamrick, 2014

[1] From the hymn, “My Hope is Built,” lyrics by Edward Mote, found at
[2] A. W. Tozer, The Pursuit of God, (Camp Hill, PA: Christian, 1993), p. XVII.
[3] A. W. Tozer, The Pursuit of Man, (Camp Hill, PA: Christian, 1993), pp. 6-7.
[4] Ibid., pp. 8-9.

Related articles:
Perseverance of the Saints v Eternal Security
Justification is Grounded on Union with Christ
Christ in You, the Hope of Glory
Do You Really Know Christ?
The Certitude of Christian Faith

This entry was posted in apologetics, Indigenous Posts, missions, theology and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Does Your Anchor Hold Within the Veil?

  1. Alan House says:

    It is possible this person was never born again. It is more likely, from a scriptural viewpoint, that he was turned aside by the deceitfulness of sin with the result that his heart became hardened against God. Unbelievers (unsaved) cannot become apostate; only believers (saved). Our SBC “OSAS” doctrine struggles, in vain, to explain this kind of a tragedy. But the scriptures explain it (apostasy) thoroughly. As a denomination, we have come to the scriptures with a “OSAS” predisposition, even though approximately seventy some-odd scriptures talk about failing to persevere in faith. Persevering in faith is NOT a work; just as expressing saving faith is NOT a work. To me, it is so odd that, as a denomination, we pride ourselves on adherence to the scriptures, but we just can’t take seriously what the scriptures say so clearly about failing to persevere. Who are you to say this man NEVER expressed saving faith in Christ? If he was saved as a child, who are you to say his childlike faith was defective? Correct doctrine harmonizes scriptures that, on the surface, seem contradictory. Erroneous doctrine doggedly takes a position from a portion of the scriptures and then ignores, or worse, explains away scriptures that directly apply to the question at hand. In this case, the ANCHOR is still holding as it always has and always will; this poor soul has decided to let go of the ANCHOR. Honestly, one would think, when less than one half of SBC church members can be found in church on Sunday morning, that we would somehow begin to take the scriptures seriously about perseverance. But no, “they were never saved” or “they are completely detached from worshiping their Savior and from any semblance of participation in the things of God BUT THEY ARE SAVED AND ON THE WAY TO GLORY, brother!” That is just not what the scriptures teach and we need to fundamentally reconsider our unwillingness to deal scripturally with the necessity of perseverance.,
    Al House

  2. parsonsmike says:

    Mr. Al House,
    One does not have an encounter with the Creator God Almighty Judge and then simply forget that such an awesome amazing person actually is.
    Second, although I empathize with you on the SBC’s lack of understanding of perseverance, I must disagree with you on your understanding. The reason why the elect persevere is because they are united with God in Christ by the Holy Spirit. The reason many self professed ‘believers’ fall away is because they were never united with God in Christ by the Holy Spirit.
    With respect to you,

  3. parsonsmike says:

    As i read your post, i was right there with you until you said this:
    “To be saved and believe in Christ only requires a decision… but it requires an honest decision from the depths of one’s heart. ”

    I request your testimony as to the grounds of your decision to believe.

  4. Alan House says:

    Mike, appreciate your comment. You are firmly in the “they were never saved” camp. In your comment to Ken, you used the “True Scotsman” logical fallacy. With regard to the question at hand, I still ask, “If he was saved as a child, who are you to say his childlike faith was defective?” Generally, the answer given to this question involves circular reasoning. Al

  5. Alan House says:

    Oops! Mike, you QUOTED Ken who was using the “True Scotsman” logical fallacy! Sorry! Al

  6. parsonsmike says:

    If a witness says the car was red, who then are you to say it wasn’t? Our witness says his faith was defective, the Bible says his faith was defective. Case closed, as far as I am concerned, no circular reasoning is necessary.

    What is the “True Scotsman” logical fallacy?

  7. parsonsmike says:

    ‘No True Scotsman’ Fallacy

    The no true scotsman fallacy is a way of reinterpreting evidence in order to prevent the refutation of one’s position. Proposed counter-examples to a theory are dismissed as irrelevant solely because they are counter-examples, but purportedly because they are not what the theory is about.

    The No True Scotsman fallacy involves discounting evidence that would refute a proposition, concluding that it hasn’t been falsified when in fact it has.

    If Angus, a Glaswegian, who puts sugar on his porridge, is proposed as a counter-example to the claim “No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge”, the ‘No true Scotsman’ fallacy would run as follows:

    (1) Angus puts sugar on his porridge.
    (2) No (true) Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge.
    (3) Angus is not a (true) Scotsman.
    (4) Angus is not a counter-example to the claim that no Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge.

    This fallacy is a form of circular argument, with an existing belief being assumed to be true in order to dismiss any apparent counter-examples to it. The existing belief thus becomes unfalsifiable.
    Real-World Examples

    An argument similar to this is often arises when people attempt to define religious groups. In some Christian groups, for example, there is an idea that faith is permanent, that once one becomes a Christian one cannot fall away. Apparent counter-examples to this idea, people who appear to have faith but subsequently lose it, are written off using the ‘No True Scotsman’ fallacy: they didn’t really have faith, they weren’t true Christians. The claim that faith cannot be lost is thus preserved from refutation. Given such an approach, this claim is unfalsifiable, there is no possible refutation of it.

    comment to follow

  8. parsonsmike says:

    The validity of the objection is based on a false understanding of what makes one a Christian.
    In any religious belief or really any vow-needed organization, there are those who join willingly and later opt out for various reasons. Their commitment or vow is decision based, and they hold the key to undo their commitment via another decision.

    Our Scotsman is said not be a Scotsman because he has done what no Scotsman would do, so it is said, and that is put sugar on his porridge. The saying is false because it is but a generalization of the subject of what a Scotsman is, and is so false because it fails to understand what makes a Scotsman, a Scotsman.

    If we were to invent a term like Nosugapor to describe those who never put sugar on their porridge, we could then validly say that our Scotsman is not a Nosugarpor since he puts sugar on his porridge. By the very definition of what a Nosugarpor is, he would eliminate himself from being of that category as soon as he puts sugar on his porridge. Some might argue that unless he eats the porridge, he remains a Nosugarpor, but purists would disagree, saying that the definition does not speak to the actual eating of the porridge but only whether one puts sugar on THEIR porridge.

    So if you define a Scotsman by whether he puts sugar on his porridge or not, you are making an error in your thinking. In reality Scotsmen are Scotsmen because of where they were born and to whom they were born to. Some might become a Scotsmen through experience if such an experience lasted long enough and made such a profound change on the individual that his heart would ever be tied to Scotland.

    If you define a Christian by his decision, or by his subsequent actions and words, especially looked at in less-than-a-lifetime time period, you could be making a mistake. Christians are emulated by others who profess to be Christian but who show they are not by their failure to persevere. What truly defines a Christian is his birth from above by God that actually changes him or her from what he was to what he or she now is.

    This change is not done by the Christian, nor is even dependent on his or her own will, but is done for the person by the Creator of all things and is whole-heartedly welcomed by the sinner and embraced by him or her. It involves a change of heart and nature and an indwelling of the Spirit of God. Just like in a physical sense, one can willingly change the fact that they were once born of the flesh, one cannot, by their will or their actions, change the fact that they have been born of the Spirit.

    Thus when one has become a born again child of God, a true Christian, they can never be anything but that, and those who fall away show that they were never really of the faith.

  9. Alan House says:

    Didn’t realize you were a 5-pointer or I would not have attempted to discuss with you. Blessings! Al

  10. De Maria says:

    Ken Hamrick said:

    It is true that we are saved by faith and not by good works or by experiencing God’s presence; however, a faith that does not result in both of these is missing something vital, and ought to drive us back to the cross to make our calling and election sure.

    This doesn’t square with Scripture. In fact, it seems a total contradiction of the Word of God:

    You say, “we are saved by faith and not by good works”

    Scripture says:
    James 2:24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.

    The other thing that strikes me in this article, is the empty claims of salvation. Scripture is clear that we have one Judge:

    1 Corinthians 4:2 Moreover it is required in stewards, that a man be found faithful. 3 But with me it is a very small thing that I should be judged of you, or of man’s judgment: yea, I judge not mine own self. 4 For I know nothing by myself; yet am I not hereby justified: but he that judgeth me is the Lord.

    So, why do Protestants claim they know who is saved and who isn’t? It is obvious, that in this case, you admit , you didn’t know. And you still don’t. It is God who judges our salvation. So, why do you claim this person is not saved?

    Romans 14:4 Who art thou that judgest another man’s servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand.

    And why do some say that once saved, one can’t fall away? Scripture is clear that some can make a shipwreck of their faith.

    1 Timothy 1:19 Holding faith, and a good conscience; which some having put away concerning faith have made shipwreck:

Comments are closed.